Thursday, May 14, 2009

New Star Trek

In the midst of writing a short story that seems to mirror the stimulus package - a massive tome crammed with wads of fat - I took my wife to see Star Trek. Overall, I enjoyed it. I thought the director overdirected much of the action stuff. Close-ups, zippy cuts, and a hyperactive camera overwhelmed certain scenes. There's nothing wrong with letting action speak for itself. But time and styles change.

Live long and perspire!

3 comments:

takineko said...

I agree. The first time I saw it some of the shakey cam action scenes combined with strobe light effects hurt my brain. The second time I was able to follow the action better than before, but still, I sure hate shakey cam. I couldn't follow most of 007 Quantom of Solace because of that.

Anonymous said...

Establishing shots are out of fashion. Someone needs to bury at least one in a time capsule for future generations or extraterrestial visitors to insert in every contemporary earth film to avoid vertigo while watching.

JP Mac said...

Also, many older films weren't afraid to let a star carry the shot and act.

The best could, which is why they were stars.

Featured Post

John P. McCann Sizzle Page

'Twas suggested I post a few episodes of my work in a pleasant spot. I've chosen here. Sadly, not everything I've written has y...